ARC 502o : Advanced Architecture Studio II

SPRING 2024

Instructors

David Wallance and Erica Blank,
Ian Dickenson,
Devan Porter,
Elizabeth McClean,
Karen Santiago.

B+W

ID

DP

EM

KS

The objective of this course is to advance in the process of architectural design, and its social, aesthetic, programmatic, representational, and technical considerations. Students will design a school, or as we will refer to it, a learning infrastructure in a specific site and context. Our work will be informed by two significant matters of concern: the climate emergency and the challenge of achieving greater equity and diversity in society.

The studio will foster students’ ability to use the tools of architectural design to understand their design process, to develop decision-making skills,  and to form an architectural intention. Throughout the process, from conceptual modeling to design development, our work will be informed by research, and we will reflect on its meaning, significance, and values. We will take a holistic and integrated approach to building technology, and students will understand the critical and technical role of building systems in architecture.

The studio pedagogy is based on cultural awareness, technical concerns, sustainable approaches, and acknowledgment of communities and places. Beginning with precedent studies, speculations on context and site, and leading to a comprehensive and integrated architectural/building proposal, the studio promotes students’ capacities for investigative and iterative thinking and making.

To achieve its objectives, the studio will deploy a range of tools of architectural representation, selecting them for their capacity to elucidate ideas, communicate information graphically, evaluate design alternatives, and visualize the critical and technical integration of systems.

The design process is neither linear nor prescriptive. Students in the course are expected to employ a cyclic, iterative process of exploration, evaluation, prototyping, testing, analyzing, and eventually refining the work. The iterative design process leads to a holistic and integrated response to program, historical references, context and site, social and cultural factors, tectonic organization and expression, spatial and aesthetic quality, and building systems, materials, and environmental performance.

B+W

Logan Sherer, Brian Motz, Maria Diven, Amy George, Justine Palmer, Bailey J Crawford, Claire Berheim, Jarod Schmitt, Francisco Zuleta, Karen Compean, Christopher Collins, Margaret Kreyling, Carlton Herbert, Shenice McKoy Brown, Brune Steven, Nathan Ellis, Ashton Smith, Brett Corell, Kyle Vance, Chrystal Davidson, Julia Olson, Madison Turner, Blake Bisig, Anissa Blake

Detailed Student Work

ID

Erika Lara, Rachel Dudley, Filene Yount, Laura Valencia, Michelle Dreyer, Sadie Schroeder, David Havlicek, Parker Biertzer, Alexandrea Cook, Hannah Hyland, Fatimah Alqaisoum

Detailed Student Work

DP

Bayan Alfaraj, Eric Chong, Alejandro Cruz,Abigael David, Sean Greene, Tinesha Lewis, Jade Masters, Frank Sandagorda, Inis Sisic, Bianca Stubler, Christopher Taormina, Tasfia Zahin

Detailed Student Work

EM

Tymberlyn Bealer, Hiba Hammoud, Kendall Massey, Deni Behaj, Zilan Jalal, Stan McCoy, Luke Ebert, Sarah Kannon, Amanda Nestor, Brady Fabisiak, Russell Landt, Ashley Madriz

Detailed Student Work

KS

Ivana Maodus, Lora Mondragon, J. Campbell Siskron, Labon Cook, Malachy Roberts, Karam Youkhna, George Eliopoulos, Ryan Kates, Lucy Taylor, Lexi Snyder, Erick Rodriguez-Guzman, Jesse Martin, Reginald Mims

Detailed Student Work